LISTEN: mp3 audio (16:44min)
“Those who spend too much will eventually be owned by those who are thrifty.”
- Sir John Templeton
Some commentary on current events, from a long-term perspective:
On July 17, 2009, US Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the national unemployment rate as 9.7%, the highest since 1983. In several states, unemployment is well over 10%, and is even as high as 20% in some metropolitan regions. This is a major employment upheaval, one that significantly impacts the financial lives of a large segment of the populace.
If the future is consistent with past history, many of those currently unemployed will eventually find their way back into the workplace when the economy rebounds. But those who return to work will find their employment landscape fundamentally and permanently changed, because it is quite likely this “Great Recession” officially marks the end of lifetime employment.
Lifetime employment was one of the crowning distinctions of the modern Industrial Age. Beginning in the post-war 1940s, it was characterized by steady employment, guaranteed pensions, and employer-provided benefits. As a result, millions of blue-collar American households ascended to middle-class affluence; they bought homes in the suburbs, sent their kids to college and after 40 years of service, retired to a life of relative security and ease. At the same time, the white-collar professional and management class grew as well. Every now and then some observer might moan about the dehumanizing aspects of factory work or cubicle life in the corporate maze, but throughout history, there’s never been a socio-economic model that delivered so many financial benefits to so many people on such a stable basis.
However, in a world where the only constant is change, Industrial Age lifetime employment could not last forever. The power technologies that fueled the Industrial Revolution (steam, electricity and the internal combustion engine) laid the foundation for the micro-technologies of the personal computer and the Internet, ushering in the Information Age. And while government policymakers may strain mightily to preserve the “old world” of lifetime corporate employment, every indication is that changes are not only on the horizon, but already here. Even American automobile manufactures finally recognized it. Unless you are working in government (including education) or the military, lifetime financial security, courtesy of your employer, is a thing of the past.
Going forward (if you haven’t experienced it already), these changes will have huge implications for your individual finances. In the emerging Information economy, workers will find it to their advantage to think and act as if they were self-employed. For some, this means adopting some different paradigms and acquiring some different financial habits.
First and foremost, the nature of your work and income may change. You are less likely to remain in one industry, with one employer, doing one job, receiving one paycheck. Instead, work is more likely to resemble a series of long-term but temporary assignments with several employers (sometimes at the same time), with periods of unemployment and self-employment. This is particularly true for younger workers. As Maureen Sharib, an employment “sourcer” from TechTrak, put in a July 14, 2007 commentary:
“Today, there are 149 million people in our nation’s workforce. Every year, approximately 50 million people leave their jobs. And approximately 50 million find new jobs. That means one-third of our workforce turns over each year because of new opportunities. And the average American has had nine jobs by the time he or she is 34 years old because of new opportunities.”
Not only are tomorrow’s workers more likely to experience regular employment changes, they will also encounter different forms of payment. While government prefers making as many workers as possible W-2 employees because income taxes are withheld by the employer, the just-in-time, low-overhead pressures of the Information economy make it financially desirable for companies to limit their full-time employees and consider out-sourcing or contracting. For many, this could mean the end of regular paychecks.
Combine frequent job changes with non-W-2 compensation and the inevitable result is irregular cash flow, one of the major characteristics of self-employment. Successful self-employment requires strategies to manage these fluctuations and still pay the bills.
As you move, you must either maintain or perpetually re-establish your benefits package. When the “company man” was the default career path, the trip included employer-provided benefits. That scenario is no longer on the table for most workers.
Even in holdover Industrial Age jobs, the cost of providing benefits has skyrocketed (particularly for health care), so most employers require employees to share in the costs. Alternately, employers reconfigure their work force so that fewer employees are eligible for any benefits. The structure of Information Age employment puts the responsibility for benefits more directly on the worker.
If offered, group disability and life insurance protection may be an inexpensive way to obtain income protection, but these options are usually limited to active employees – if you terminate employment, you can’t take the coverage with you (you may be able to convert life coverage to an individual policy, but the costs are no longer at group rates). This leaves you either hoping your new (and often temporary) employer will offer similar benefits, or hoping you are healthy enough to qualify for similar benefits on an individual basis. The older you get, the more problematic this arrangement becomes.
In the long run, securing a personally-owned package of portable (and permanent) benefits may be a better option, particularly for disability and life insurance, where premiums and coverages for individual policies can be guaranteed to remain the same for specified time periods. In addition, healthy individuals who obtain permanent coverage at a young age may realize some long-term savings because younger, healthy individuals usually subsidize the costs of insuring older, less healthy people in group policies.
Not only must your benefits package be portable, but so must your financial management systems. All employers are subject to regulation regarding taxes and withholding for the employees on their payrolls. This includes the requirements to pay the employer’s portion of FICA and Medicare taxes, plus withholding on income paid to employees. However, when workers are paid by the job or under 1099 conditions, the responsibility for these taxes falls on the worker, not the employer. This increases the possibility that you may have to make quarterly estimated tax payments, at both the state and federal levels. (Even if you receive a W-2, you may be considered a “non-statutory employee,” in which case the employer will not manage your withholding requirements.)
This means your tax return will probably require more than a 1040-EZ form. It also means you’ll want to keep records for deductible expenses, as well as earnings.
Additionally, employers typically handle automatic deductions for qualified retirement plans, like 401(k)s, and often facilitate direct-deposit transactions, making it easy to execute long-term saving objectives. But if you’re not eligible to participate in a company’s plan, where will you put retirement savings – and how will you deposit the money? These issues must be addressed by your financial management system.
Beyond finding the financial vehicle and making the deposits, you are responsible for creating your own pension income from these savings. Unlike the Industrial Era job, there are no formulas based on average salary and years of service to determine your retirement benefit. Instead, it’s up to you to answer questions like: How much funding will be required? When will you be able to receive payments? How big will they be? In addition to figuring out how to best accumulate the funds, you must also become your own actuary and determine how they will be distributed.
Consider the brief listing above of additional assignments: Insurance, Accounting, Retirement Planning. For the typical employee at the end of the Industrial Age, all these assignments were handled “in-house:” It was group benefits, a W-2, and a pension. Now, the trend is that these are being replaced by the individual. Not surprisingly, it appears many individuals are not up to the challenge of functioning as self-employed independent contractors. Statistical evidence seems to indicate that too many people are under-insured against the difficulties of life, and under-funded for retirement.
This collective poor performance has compelled government officials to seek legislative fixes, using taxation and regulation to guarantee minimum levels of financial well-being. The legislative push for national health care is the most prominent example of current government initiatives, but in the past year, other items have been considered as well, including an idea to establish mandatory all-inclusive Government Retirement Accounts (GRAs) as replacements for company-sponsored 401(k)s.
Some might think that broadly-available government programs for insurance and retirement might serve as suitable replacements for Industrial Age company benefits, sparing individuals the challenges of self-employment. But anytime government enacts policies that seem to restrict or resist market forces (such as out-sourcing, globalization and the Internet), there are usually unintended consequences.
For example, economists have regularly documented that minimum-wage laws typically lead to either a decline in employment or inflation. While those who are currently working at low-wage jobs do make more money, employers often consider hiring fewer workers or raise their prices to accommodate their increased labor costs.
What might be the unintended consequences in some of these government proposals? Suppose the law requires companies over a certain size to provide health insurance or be hit with a fine. Depending on the cost, one practical response might be to shrink the company (or perhaps divide it), to fall below the threshold. After careful analysis, another option might be to pay the fine, but not provide insurance. Even if the company conforms to the proposal, the insurance coverage may not be a plan that matches the individual’s medical needs.
Because no one knows how the national health care issue will play out, the above comments are pure speculation. Perhaps politicians can actually craft a utopian solution that delivers far beyond our wildest dreams. But the pragmatic response, considering history, is to assume that government initiatives will not restore Industrial Age benefits to the Information Age economy. Better to think and act as a self-employed individual than hope for nationalized group benefits.
(Even with mandated nationalized programs, you still end up functioning as an individual. Think of Social Security. When it comes time to apply for benefits, you aren’t part of a union, or some other select pool of beneficiaries. You don’t have a Human Resources advocate to guide you through your options – you’ll go through the bureaucratic maze on your own, or hire expert assistance – just like a self-employed person would.)
30 years ago, a successful self-employed individual understood the necessity of a team of financial advisors. Finding someone to keep books, secure insurance, oversee investments, prepare returns, was part of the cost of doing business. This hasn’t changed. If you’re self-employed, you will almost certainly benefit from expert assistance.
One of the fortunate side effects of the Information Age is the expanded access to expert services and technologies. When computers occupied entire floors in corporate offices, only big businesses could deliver the benefits of advanced technologies. Now, a personal computer and an Internet connection can bring all sorts of expertise right to your doorstep. And the technology far surpasses anything that was produced by a 1970s main-frame program.
It is understandable that some people choose to hold onto the past as long as possible; they will do everything possible to preserve the status quo. But contrary to efforts by politicians to “preserve” or “create” more Industrial Age jobs, the free-market trend is toward a new era, and a different paradigm. Specialized self-employment comes with a new set of challenges, but also better ways to overcome them.
Here’s a simple checklist. As a self-employed individual, how well have you…
YOU ARE SELF-EMPLOYED. BE YOUR OWN BOSS.
Filed Under: CONTROL, THINK | Leave a Comment
LISTEN: mp3 audio (2:12 min)
At an intellectual level, everyone understands that inflation affects prices – the same product or service costs more because our money is worth less. But at the same time, technology and other economic factors can also have an affect on prices, which is why computers and other electronic technology devices seem to get cheaper all the time, even with monetary inflation. So it can be hard to tell if the things we buy are really more expensive than they used to be.
This is why economists have developed the idea of adjusting for inflation. By taking the price for a similar commodity from the past and adjusting that number for inflation, it provides a method for comparing prices from different eras.
Question: According to the GasBuddy website (www.gasbuddy.com) the average price for a gallon of gasoline in the United States on June 25, 2009 was $2.63. Adjusting for inflation, how does this price compare to the average price in 1979?
A.) Higher
B.) Lower
C.) About the same
The correct answer is “B”.
Using data from the Consumer Price Index, which the Bureau of Labor Statistics uses to calculate inflation, $2.63 today is the equivalent of .79 in 1979. From historical information provided by the Energy Information Administration, the average price of a gallon of gasoline in the United States in 1979 was .86 per gallon. This means a gallon of gas is 8% cheaper today than it was 30 years ago.
Filed Under: SEE, THINK | Leave a Comment
LISTEN: mp3 audio (10:13 min)
Rebecca Wilder, the pen name for an “economist working in the financial services industry in Boston, MA,” had this headline in a December 28, 2009 newsneconomics.com article.
“The Hottest Trend in 2009: Declaring Bankruptcy“
Jane Bryant Quinn kicked off the New Year with these comments in the January 12, 2009 issue of Newsweek:
“Go bankrupt in 2009. If you’re reaching the end of your rope, don’t try to hold on. Save what you can“
Either these commentators know their stuff, or a lot of people are following their advice. A June 3, 2009 USA Today article reported that consumer and commercial bankruptcy filings are on a pace to “reach a stunning 1.5 million this year, according to a report from Automated Access to Court Electronic Records…In May, the number of bankruptcy filings reached 6,020 a day, up from 5,854 in April.”
This is sobering information, especially in light of legislative reforms enacted in 2005 that made it more difficult to use bankruptcy as a legal procedure to erase debts. And while most of the increase in filings is due to the financial distress inflicted by a struggling economy, a change in attitude may also be a factor.
Some may now see bankruptcy as a pre-emptive measure rather than an act of last resort. Quoting Bryant: “The right time to go bankrupt is when you’re financially stuck but still have assets to protect.” As more people file for bankruptcy, the social stigma diminishes, individuals are taking a closer look at the legal and financial merits of a bankruptcy filing.
Bankruptcy has a long history, going back to ancient times, because there have always been people who find themselves unable to pay their debts. While not an ideal solution, the process of bankruptcy provides a structure for resolving this dilemma, for both debtors and creditors.
The word bankruptcy comes from the Latin bancus, the tradesman’s counter, and ruptus, broken. (In Rome at the time of the Caesars, a merchant or tradesman unable to pay his debts would have his bench in the market place either broken or removed by a court-appointed official, who would then auction off the bankrupt person’s property to the highest bidder.)
The first English bankruptcy law was passed in England in the late 1500s during the rein of Henry VIII, and provided the foundation for basis for bankruptcy laws in the United States. Under both Roman and English law, bankruptcy was not something an individual chose; rather it was forced upon them by their creditors. Besides the seizing of assets, creditors could continue to demand repayment of all outstanding debts. If the debtor failed to repay, some laws allowed for imprisonment and even physical punishment.
Today, there are two basic forms of court-authorized bankruptcy: liquidation or reorganization. In the US, liquidation is known as Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, which refers to the chapter of the bankruptcy law that allows your assets to be sold off. Reorganization bankruptcies can fall under Chapters 11, 12 and 13, with 13 applying to most individuals. Chrysler and General Motors both filed under Chapter 11. When you file for bankruptcy, the court prohibits your creditors from taking action to collect debts without the approval of the court.
In a liquidation bankruptcy, you put your personal property in the hands of the bankruptcy court, which sells it and uses the proceeds to pay your debts (or as much of your debt as possible). Once the process is completed, old creditors have no further claim of payment, but the bankruptcy stays on your credit history for 10 years, which may result in restriction or denial if you attempt to borrow money during that time.
Under the new law passed in 2005, you may not have the choice of filing a Chapter 7 liquidation bankruptcy. If your income exceeds the median income for the same size family in your state, you must submit to a bankruptcy means assessment. This test essentially establishes a budget for you, based on a minimum standard of living. If after imposing this budget, the court believes that you have $100 or more per month in disposable income that you could apply towards your debt repayment, you may be pushed into a repayment plan under Chapter 13, instead of qualifying for Chapter 7.
In any reorganization bankruptcy, the filer submits a repayment proposal to the bankruptcy court. Payment plans usually cover three to five years, and not all debts receive equal treatment. The law requires that some debts must be repaid in full, while others may require a percentage, and some may not be repaid at all.
There are some debts that cannot be discharged or “forgiven.” These include debts you forget to list in your bankruptcy papers, child support and alimony, most student loans, fines and penalties as a result of breaking the law, tax debts, and judgments for personal injury or death caused by driving while intoxicated.
During the repayment period, the court will place restrictions on how you can spend money. In many cases, wages will be garnished by a trustee of the court, who will make the payments to your creditors.
Provided you make your payments as promised, it is possible that creditors will grant you credit at the end of the repayment period. But the bankruptcy will stay on your credit history for six years.
Bankruptcy laws allow filers to exempt certain types of assets from liquidation for settlement with their creditors. Typical exemptions include homesteads or personal residences, qualified retirement accounts, college saving accounts and some types of trusts. These exemptions are designed to keep filers from losing everything, but often create some potential ethical and legal challenges – with significant adverse financial consequences if abused.
Federal government allows each state to determine which assets are exempt, and there can be quite a variation in which assets qualify. Some states have generous exemptions, some do not. When individuals are contemplating bankruptcy, they may realize that certain assets might be excluded from bankruptcy if the asset could be transferred to someone else. Or they might conclude that it would be advantageous to establish residence in a different state, because the bankruptcy exemptions are more favorable. This awareness leads to what some bankruptcy attorneys call “exemption planning.”
While some measures can be taken to enhance the status of exempt assets, individuals must understand that “transfer of assets prior to filing is generally a ‘no-no,’ “ according to Leon Bayer, a Los Angeles Bankruptcy lawyer with 29 years of experience, in a legal guide posted on avvo.com. Bayer continues: “Do not hide, conceal, transfer, or falsely encumber non-exempt assets. Doing so carries the risk of being prosecuted for committing bankruptcy crimes, it is likely to result in the denial of a bankruptcy discharge, and the trustee can still recover such property, or its value, from whoever it was given to.”
Indirectly, the issue of bankruptcy emphasizes the importance of forward-thinking risk management. While you know you can’t expect to transfer assets in anticipation of filing bankruptcy, the ramifications of a possible future bankruptcy may cause you to consider how your assets are owned right now. In the event of a financial setback, one that might result in either bankruptcy or a lawsuit, which assets would you want protected? Planning (and action) undertaken now might be your best defense against sacrificing years of hard work to satisfy creditors or litigants.
Nobody wants to file bankruptcy. Nobody wants to be in an automobile accident, either. But while most responsible individuals recognize the value of auto insurance, a much smaller percentage actually follow through on securing “insurance” on their assets, either through the vehicles they use, or the financial structures around them.
Because of bankruptcy’s complex legal issues and the variations between different states, it is important that any asset transfers be supervised by competent legal counsel. The licensed insurance or investment professional you work with should be made aware of your intentions, as they can provide assistance with the details of properly titling assets, from the perspective of their industry expertise.
Filed Under: THINK | Leave a Comment
LISTEN: mp3 audio (3:30 min)
Is this a bull or bear market?
It depends on your perspective.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 stock market index is a mathematical calculation of the collective value of selected U.S. stocks. On March 9, 2009 the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index closed at 676.53, its lowest closing value in well over a decade. On June 15, the same stock index finished at 923.72, a 36.5 percent increase in a little more than three months. Since financial analysts often identify a bull market as one in which values rise more than 20 percent over a previous low, the recent run-up certainly seems to qualify as good news for stock market investors. Except…
As the retirement planning website dshort.com succinctly reported on June 15, 2009, “The S&P 500 is 36% above the March 9th low, but 41.2% below the October 2007 high.” A bear market is usually identified as one where values are 20 percent below a previous low.
Yes.
Which means…it may be a secular bear market.
A “secular market” is defined as one where the long-term trend is up or down (i.e., bull or bear), but punctuated by periods of significant counter-trends. A secular bull market will include some bearish periods, a secular bear market will still have some bullish moments.
According to investopedia.com, secular market trends since 1900 have lasted from 5 to 25 years. During this time there have been three secular bull markets and three secular bear markets. The last secular market was a bull – the long-term trend was upward – and began in 1983. When did the bullish trend end? It depends on your perspective. Some sources will say 2000, others point to 2007. One of the characteristics of secular trends is that it takes awhile to identify them.
An Analysis of Secular Bear Markets and Secular Bull Markets since 1900, issued by amateur-investor.net in June 2009, identifies the secular bull and bear markets using S&P 500 data. But the time period from 2000 forward ends with a “?”; in other words, after nine years there’s still no conclusion on whether the long-term trend is up or down.
Statistics may accurately represent historical events, but still need a framework in which to interpret them in order to be useful. The perspective matters as much as the math.
Filed Under: MEASURE, THINK | Leave a Comment

Learn how by grabbing our complimentary Prosperity Accelerator Pack - a short overview of an approach aimed at accelerating your prosperity – with less worry, uncertainty, and stress.
When you get your complimentary Prosperity Accelerator Pack, you'll also get a FREE subscription to our Prosperity On Purpose ezine as our thanks!
Your contact information is safe with us. Click here for our Privacy Policy.